Sunday, September 28, 2008

Short-Selling Isn’t Bad

A blogging2007. Production

Title Short-Selling Isn’t Bad published to blogging2007.

Report sent to blogging2007. about Short-Selling Isn’t Bad
This article is located at blogging2007.
FEDERAL regulators have banned short sales of more than 800 stocks, mostly of financial companies, in an effort to stabilize prices in a shaky market. But the move may have an unintended consequence: reducing the stock market’s efficiency and prolonging the current crisis. Stuart Goldenberg That’s the consensus of several finance professors who have devoted considerable energy to the study of short-selling — a mode of trading in which a profit is made from a price decline. Short-sellers, like investors who go “long” on a stock, make money by buying low and selling high. The difference is that short-sellers reverse the usual chronological order, selling first and buying back later, at what they hope will be a lower price. They accomplish this time switch by selling borrowed shares and agreeing to return them later. Were short-sellers ganging up on various stocks in the recent tumult, causing prices to plummet? Adam Reed, a finance professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill who has extensively studied short-sellers’ behavior and its effects on the markets, said it was “hypothetically possible” that they were. He added, though, that the question still needs study because real-time information about these possible “bear raids” isn’t available. But he would be surprised if short-sellers were a major cause of the market’s turmoil over the last year. “In recent years,” he said, “when academic researchers have looked for bear raids — even in those areas in which investors suspected that they existed — they haven’t found them.” Consider a group of 19 beleaguered financial stocks for which the S.E.C. restricted short sales between July 21 and Aug. 15. Arturo Bris, a finance professor at IMD, the Swiss business school, who also is a research fellow at the Yale International Center for Finance, analyzed short-sellers’ behavior in the months before this S.E.C. action. He concluded that the poor performance of those 19 stocks in the year leading to that action “cannot be attributed to short-selling activities.” One of the statistics on which Professor Bris focused was the so-called short-interest ratio, which is calculated by dividing the number of shares held short by the average daily trading volume. On average, those 19 stocks had short-interest ratios that were no higher than those of other financial stocks in the year leading up to the S.E.C. policy change. And here is another telling statistic: While the S.E.C. restrictions were in place, these stocks, on average, actually performed worse than the rest of the market. What about the dismal performance of many financial stocks earlier this month? It’s too early to know, Professor Reed said, because the data are not all in. But here, too, he said he doubts that short-sellers played any significant role. Consider, for example, what short-sellers did on Sept. 9, a day that rumors circulated widely about a possible bankruptcy at Lehman Brothers and Lehman’s stock fell 45 percent, to $7.79 from $14.15. According to Professor Bris, the average price at which short-sellers sold Lehman stock that day was $9.29, significantly closer to the day’s low than to the high. That implies that they were reacting to the downward momentum, not causing it. Typically, Professor Bris said, “short-sellers trade in response to past negative news, rather than inducing current stock price drops.” What about “naked shorting“ or “failure to deliver” borrowed shares, a practice that was the focus of the S.E.C. restrictions in July? These terms are used to describe a breach of the standard practice in which a short-seller has three trading days to actually borrow the shares he is selling short. Naked shorting has been blamed for some of financial stocks’ recent woes, but Professor Reed says this claim isn’t supported by the evidence. Each day, the exchanges publish a list of stocks for which there has been even a very small number of failures to deliver. In recent months, according to Professor Reed, the large financial stocks have hardly ever appeared on those lists. Then there is the abolition of the so-called uptick rule on short sales in July 2007. When the rule was in place, a stock could not be sold short unless its last trade was higher than its previous traded price. The rule, put into effect in the 1930s, was intended to prevent short-sellers from accelerating the downward momentum of an already-declining stock. Has the rule’s removal been an important contributor to the bear market of the last year? Professor Reed doubts it. Before scrapping the uptick rule, the S.E.C. ran a pilot program to test the possible consequences. In the test, the rule was lifted from hundreds of stocks that were part of the Russell 3000 index. The trading patterns of these stocks were exhaustively analyzed in a number of academic studies, all of which concluded that the rule had no significant impact on those stocks’ price movements, Professor Reed said. Short-sellers may be greedy. But, Professor Bris argued, it makes no more sense to blame them for the woes of financial companies than it does to blame the investors who bought those companies’ stocks at inflated prices. If these investors hadn’t been willing to buy those stocks, he said, the short-sellers couldn’t have sold those stocks short. ONE point is clear, he said: Banning short-selling will adversely affect the stock market’s efficiency by reducing liquidity and making it harder to settle on appropriate prices. “The ban on short-selling may prolong the crisis,” he said, “in the sense that it will now take the markets longer to adjust to the true values of financial companies.” That means investors should think twice before buying shares of any companies for which short-selling is now banned, Professor Reed said. In his research, he said, he has found that “stocks without short-selling not infrequently trade at prices that deviate widely from their true value.”

Naked Short Selling Isn't the Problem
Naked Short Selling Isn't the Problem ... Wall Street engaged in bad business practices for years. They bought hundreds of ...
more ...
go to website
Cached

Cheer Up, Ben: Your Economy Isn't As Bad as This One - WSJ.com
Cheer Up, Ben: Your Economy Isn't As Bad as This One In the Make-Believe World Of ... SEC Is Set to Issue Temporary Ban Against Short Selling 47 comments; 5. Worst Crisis Since ...
more ...
go to website
Cached

The Falling Dollar Isn't All Bad - Seeking Alpha
... article in the New York Times on Friday saying that a lower dollar isnt all bad for the ... A Clear Case of Overpromising $800 Billion for RTC 2.0 - Then What? Why Short-Selling Bans ...
more ...
go to website
Cached

Sunshine Notes » Short Selling
... the legendary financial scoundrel, Daniel Drew, understood naked short selling was bad (as he lost his fortune covering a short squeeze) when he said, “ He who sells what isnt ...
more ...
go to website
Cached

Investors, Recession Really Isn't All That Bad (Apple, Google) at ...
SEC's Short-Selling Ban Mauls Prudent Hedgers ... provided by Briefing.com. You Are Viewing: Investors, Recession Really Isn't All That Bad ...
more ...
go to website
Cached



Maybe short-selling isn't so bad, after all
U.S. regulators have banned short sales of more than 800 stocks, mostly of financial companies, in an effort to stabilize prices in a shaky market. But the move may have an unintended consequence: reducing the stock market's efficiency and prolonging ...
more ...
go to website
Source: International Herald Tribune
NewsDateTime: 11 hours ago

A nation of debtors
Dave C from Deadmonton, Canada writes: WE are every bit as bad here in Canada, possibly worse in some areas. ... Open your eyes, it isn't subprime morgages that are the problem.. they are just the symptom our whole monetary system is ...
more ...
go to website
Source: Globe and Mail
NewsDateTime: 1 hour ago

Short selling shouldering disproportionate amount of blame for crisis
To argue that investors who provide an early warning for troubled accounting "are the bad guys, it's hard for me to ... Short selling isn't the cause of this problem by any means. The real issue in all of this was excessive leverage.
more ...
go to website
Source: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
NewsDateTime: 12 hours ago

Busch stands by statement that season is over
Busch isn't buying it. Standing by comments he made after blowing an engine at ... Here's how I look at it: you can't count on anybody else having a bad race ... Cuomo expands short selling probe Premier League:
more ...
go to website
Source: Salon
NewsDateTime: 9/26/2008

RBS will get 'billions' in US bail-out of economy
England isn't even safe for the English, and nor is Scotland. ... meow I bet the RBS was offloaded with a load of bad debt originally from the USA ... With every day and with every commentator, it has become clearer that short selling might ...
more ...
go to website
Source: Sunday Herald
NewsDateTime: 1 hour ago



The details of the bailout deal


From Office of Speaker Nancy Pelosi -- Sept. 28, 2008
REINVEST,
REIMBURSE,
REFORM
IMPROVING THE FINANCIAL RESCUE LEGISLATION


Significant bipartisan work has built consensus around dramatic improvements to the original Bush-Paulson plan to stabilize American financial markets -- including cutting in half the Administration's initial request for $700 billion and requiring Congressional review for any future commitment of taxpayers' funds. If the government loses money, the financial industry will pay back the taxpayers.
3 Phases of a Financial Rescue with Strong Taxpayer Protections
# Reinvest in the troubled financial markets … to stabilize our economy and insulate Main Street from Wall Street
# Reimburse the taxpayer … through ownership of shares and appreciation in the value of purchased assets
# Reform business-as-usual on Wall Street … strong Congressional oversight and no golden parachutes
CRITICAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE RESCUE PLAN
Democrats have insisted from day one on substantial changes to make the Bush-Paulson plan acceptable -- protecting American taxpayers and Main Street -- and these elements will be included in the legislation
Protection for taxpayers, ensuring THEY share IN ANY profits
# Cuts the payment of $700 billion in half and conditions future payments on Congressional review
# Gives taxpayers an ownership stake and profit-making opportunities with participating companies
# Puts taxpayers first in line to recover assets if participating company fails
# Guarantees taxpayers are repaid in full -- if other protections have not actually produced a profit
# Allows the government to purchase troubled assets from pension plans, local governments, and small banks that serve low- and middle-income families
Limits on excessive compensation for CEOs and executives
New restrictions on CEO and executive compensation for participating companies:
# No multi-million dollar golden parachutes
# Limits CEO compensation that encourages unnecessary risk-taking
# Recovers bonuses paid based on promised gains that later turn out to be false or inaccurate
Strong independent oversight and transparency
Four separate independent oversight entities or processes to protect the taxpayer
# A strong oversight board appointed by bipartisan leaders of Congress
# A GAO presence at Treasury to oversee the program and conduct audits to ensure strong internal controls, and to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse
# An independent Inspector General to monitor the Treasury Secretary's decisions
Transparency -- requiring posting of transactions online -- to help jumpstart private sector demand
# Meaningful judicial review of the Treasury Secretary's actions
Help to prevent home foreclosures crippling the American economy
# The government can use its power as the owner of mortgages and mortgage backed securities to facilitate loan modifications (such as, reduced principal or interest rate, lengthened time to pay back the mortgage) to help reduce the 2 million projected foreclosures in the next year
# Extends provision (passed earlier in this Congress) to stop tax liability on mortgage foreclosures
# Helps save small businesses that need credit by aiding small community banks hurt by the mortgage crisis—allowing these banks to deduct losses from investments in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac stocks


Videos from YouTube
Title: Bill Clinton On The Bailout
Categories: News,global,clinton,bailout,bill,bank,

Published on: 9/25/2008 7:42:59 AM
Title: Palin: Bailout is about healthcare!
Categories: News,bailout,couric,news,cbs,thinkprogres,healthcare,palin,

Published on: 9/25/2008 11:25:46 AM
Title: Ron Paul Fox News 9/17/08 AIG bailout
Categories: News,Fox,Baldwin,Ron,McKinney,News,Paul,Nader,

Published on: 9/17/2008 3:23:30 PM
Title: Congressman Ron Paul Schools Bernanke on the Bailout Plan
Categories: Price,Monetary,Wall,Bail,Constitutionality,News,Bailout,Ron,Bernanke,Street,Out,Authority,Debt,Fixing,Federal,Paul,Depression,

Published on: 9/24/2008 11:32:51 AM
Title: Let's Play "WALLSTREET BAILOUT" The Rules Are... Rep Kaptur
Categories: military,economy,congress,taxcuts,gitmo,habeas,News,congresswoman,relief,mama,bush,kaptur,iraq,cheney,bill,corpus,

Published on: 9/22/2008 8:03:52 PM


If you like this article, you can digg it , share it or socialize it .
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Spurl
  • TailRank
  • YahooMyWeb
If your sharing service is not shown above use socializer.

You can also subscribe to the feed for Blogging 2007



View My Stats


Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home